Vagrant creates virtual machines with a virtualisation tool below it (VirtualBox), while Docker deploys containers and its support is a containerisation technology, Vagrant versus Docker. However, the basis is completely different.
Its mode of operating can be compared with Docker in this aspect. The machines it deploys are based on boxes, and you indicate which box you want to deploy from the code. I personally cannot find advantages in using Vagrant for this function. Machines can be deployed on Cloud providers such as AWS by installing plug-ins. By default it is used with VirtualBox, but it is compatible with other providers such as VMware or Hyper-V. Vagrant enables you to deploy test environments locally, quickly and very simply, based on code.
#Vagrant vs terraform manual
This means it is necessary to avoid making changes manually to the infrastructure deployed by Terraform (and never Manual changes, ever), as the tfstate file is not updated and inconsistencies will therefore be created. Terraform will not connect to AWS to see what is deployed. It is very important to note that this state is what Terraform knows. The last point to note about Terraform is that it is based on a file called tfstate, in which the information relating to infrastructure status is progressively stored and updated, which it consults to see whether changes need to be made to the infrastructure. It is launched from any site with access to the tfstate (which can be remote, stored in common storage such as AWS S3) and with Terraform installed, which is distributed as a binary downloadable from the HashiCorp website. It is a distributed tool whose common, centralised element is the tfstate file (explained in the next paragraph).
#Vagrant vs terraform full
This means HashiCorp is doing things right, so understanding and learning about its solutions is appropriate.Īlthough we are focusing on their use in the Cloud environment, their solutions are widely used in on-premises environments, but they reach their full potential when working in the cloud.Īt this point, we can see that while in Ansible we would set the number of instances to be deployed at 2 so that a total of 7 are deployed, in Terraform we would set the number directly to 7 and Terraform knows that it needs to deploy 2 more because there are already 5 deployed.Īnother important aspect is that Terraform does not need a Master server such as Chef or Puppet. In addition to the products we present in this article, they also have attractive Enterprise solutions.Īs regards the impact of its solutions, Terraform has become a standard on the market. The source code for its products is released under MIT licence, which has been well received within the Open Source community (over 100 developers are continually providing improvements) Its products now provide robust solutions in provisioning, security, interconnection and workload coordination fields.
These products have set standards in infrastructure automation. HashiCorp has been developing a variety of Open Source products over recent years that offer cross-cutting infrastructure management in cloud and on-premises environments.
0 kommentar(er)
